Irregular Verbiage

from the desk of Colin Nicholls

Page 20 of 61

Whatever

In base 8,  it’s 50.
In base 12, it’s 34.
In base 40, it’s 10.
In base 10, it’s 40.
In base 16, it’s 28.
In base 2,  it’s 101000.
In anyone’s book, it’s a milestone. And although it may or may not be all downhill from here, currently the view is pretty nice.

War of the Worlds (2005)

Wow. I mean, Wow. If you had asked me if Spielberg could actually pull off the task of translating H.G. Wells’ beloved 1898 novel onto celluloid and into the present day, I would have replied that it was an almost impossible task and he was bound to fail. Doubly so if Tom Cruise was involved.

Ask me again, for in my opinion Spielberg has done the impossible and created a perfect film – almost. Alas, I must subtract 2 points from a possible 10, but as I shall describe below, it is his own damn fault, and not that of the source material.

Indeed, he has followed the original story of the novel much more closely than I would have believed possible. Kudos to him – he makes it work. I have read some reviews from numbskulls who have clearly not read Wells’ novel, to whom I say, sod off. You have no right complaining about the ending, or even the basic narrative. Read the book, then decide if you must that you don’t like it. But don’t dis Steven S. for accurately following the master story-teller.

Now, about the Cruise thing. Spielberg gets around the fact that Cruise – an over-rated actor if you ask me – is really only capable of playing a wanker, by casting him as: a wanker. Not suprisingly, it works. Cruise gives up a really good performance. Good one, Steven.

The war machines are unbelievably bad-ass. Industrial Light and Magic deserve many, many oscars for this, but I suppose they will have to make do with the one that I think they are almost guaranteed to receive for this outstanding work. I want to see the movie again, several times, purely to see the tripods unleash a metric square kilometer of whup-ass on Newark.

I LOVED THIS FILM.

So where do I subtract points? It’s hard to say without possible spoilers, so STOP READING NOW if you haven’t see the film and want to remain a virgin. (By the way – I do not consider it to be a spoiler that this movie is about an invasion of alien war machines that throw a party to which humans are not invited.)

I feel compelled to subtract points for the following things:

There’s a part in the film where we are shown the really stupid way the alien intelligences presumably arrive on earth. If I recall correctly, this mechanism is shown, and described as though it were true and reasonable. But it’s a really crap theory. It would have been fine if the woman describing the scenes on the videotape had made it clear that she was conjecturing about what they might be looking at. Let me say again: No explanation should have been presented as “gospel” as to how the aliens arrived on Earth. The humans in the film didn’t know; and had no way of knowing. But instead, it is presented to the audience as though this was actually how the aliens had arrived. It didn’t have to be that way. Spielberg could have fixed this by making sure that it was clear to us – the audience – that the people in the film didn’t know what they were looking at, and the theory was being presented by a character who clearly didn’t know what she was seeing. The explanation she gave was really stupid. It would have been fine for us – the audience – to not know how the aliens arrived either.

If I were editing the film, I would have completely removed the scene (about 1 minute long) to avoid the whole issue.

At one point the flesh-and-blood aliens actually show up and personally, I thought it was silly and unnecessary. It’s only a couple of minutes long, and again, the scene should have ended up on the cutting room floor.

But the worst thing is completely Spielberg’s fault. Rather than tell what what is wrong with the last (but one) scene, let me instead describe to you the scene as I would have written it:

Ray Ferrier and daughter walk along the deserted Boston suburban street, towards his ex-wife’s mother’s house. They walk up to the house, and knock on the door. It opens. The only remaining living occupants are the ex-wife, and the mother. Her father, her second husband Tim are both dead (because during the beginning days of the invasion they almost certainly would have gone out to see what was going on and been killed along with everyone else). The daughter and ex-wife cling to each other. The matriarchal mother (who earlier in the film, we are given to understand probably detests Ray for what he supposedly put her daughter through) – embraces Ray with uncharacteristic emotion because he is all that is left. His sins are forgiven because he survived and protected her granddaughter.

Y’see, I think that is a little more likely that what Spielberg filmed.

8 out of 10.

For your consideration: The Rising Sun

The Rising Sun restaurant emerged from the ashes of an Italian buffet about two years ago, taking the form of a nice family Japanese sushi joint. We ate there a couple of times either side of seeing a movie at the Regal Village Square 18 picture theater. They had good dinner combo deals… your standard neighborhood sushi joint.

About 6 months ago, it once again underwent a change of management, with a completely different and more expensive looking menu. Normally when this happens, I have sighed at the loss of yet another friendly affordable sushi venue, and changed my plans for the evening. Fortunately, a couple of weeks ago, when faced with this sudden case of confounded expectations, I was with some guests from out-of-town and – having promised them sushi – really didn’t want to disappoint them. I explained that I could no longer vouch for the experience, and put it to a vote. We agreed: we’d take the risk.

I’m very glad we did.

Don’t waste your money on the usual sashimi and ngiri choices because that’s not really what they are about. You can get those elsewhere. Instead, go for the special rolls. There’s a large number of options and they are all delicious.

Yes, it’s more expensive. We won’t be idly dropping in on a whim. But the food is worth it. It’s creative, it’s tasty, and in my opinion it competes with the out-of-this-world creations of Nobu and frankly that’s saying something. (I also enjoyed the bottle of chilled, unfiltered saki we had with the meal and I’m sure that last time I tasted that was at Nobu.)

I highly recommend this restaurant for special occasions and the odd treat. I can’t afford to go there every week but I’d like to.

Shiny

We saw an awesome movie the other night at Brendan Palms. It was a “special advance preview” of a film coming out in September sometime. It’s called “Serenity” and it’s kind of a Sci-Fi Western. It’s almost perfect.

I don’t know if this film will apeal to those who weren’t fans of the original cancelled TV series “Firefly” on which it was based, but I hope so. There’s a chance.

Riverbend: The Maelstrom

Detainees coming back after weeks or months in prison talk of being forced to eat pork, not being allowed to pray, being exposed to dogs, having Islam insulted and generally being treated like animals trapped in a small cage. At the end of the day, it’s not about words or holy books or pork or dogs or any of that. It’s about what these things symbolize on a personal level. It is infuriating to see objects that we hold sacred degraded and debased by foreigners who felt the need to travel thousands of kilometers to do this. That’s not to say that all troops disrespect Islam- some of them seem to genuinely want to understand our beliefs. It does seem like the people in charge have decided to make degradation and humiliation a policy.

By doing such things, this war is taken to another level- it is no longer a war against terror or terrorists- it is, quite simply, a war against Islam and even secular Muslims are being forced to take sides.

Source: Riverbend’s latest post

Not the same old grind

Our little blade coffee grinder burnt out the other week. Although we had a backup, I decided that it was time for a new coffee grinder. Many coffee addicts^H^H^H^H afficionados do not recommend the blade kind because they say it is hard to get a consistent grind with them, and they have a tendency to burn the coffee with heat.

KitchenAid Burr Grinder

I am, naturally, skeptical, but we went shopping for the recommended “burr” grinder and found one we liked in Bloomingdales: the Kitchenaid Coffee Mill, in fire-engine red. (The embarassing fact that the whole time we were in the shop we thought we were actually in Macys is beside the point, and will not be mentioned. Oops.)

The grinder fits under our kitchen cupboards perfectly, and so far I can say that I am coming around to the same opinion as the experts. We’ve set the grind to “fine” for our espresso machine, and so far three different varieties of coffee beans have been put through the machine and the grind has been very good each time, with no adjustment required. Also, I think I can detect the difference  with respect to the lack of “scorching”. It may be just a smell thing, rather than taste, but lets face it, that’s what 80% of coffee is about.

So – a burr grinder is recommended, and so far I have nothing bad to say about the KitchenAid Coffee Mill.

Update: Lisa pointed out that it looks almost exactly like Tom Servo:

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024 Irregular Verbiage

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑